Alan Elias presents his sketch plan

AngelView developer Alan Elias presents his sketch plan to the Lake County Planning Commission.

After several hours of testimony and discussion on the latest iteration of the AngelView Subdivision, the Lake County Planning Commission came to no decision and decided to reconvene the public hearing on Feb. 24.

The current proposal, as presented by Alan Elias, calls for a residential development with a private event center on 71.09 acres just east of the Village of Twin Lakes. A total of 15 lots are planned, each with a minimum of three acres.

An earlier plan for AngelView was turned down due to potential landslide hazards pointed out by the Colorado Geological Survey. It consisted of two phases with 12 homes in phase 1 and an undetermined number in phase 2. The current site plan does not have a second phase. The 15 homes would be served by wells and septic systems and would comprise a gated community.

Also proposed is an emergency services site with building and site improvements to be dedicated to the county in the final plat.

County planners expressed some concern with the proposed event center on the property, saying that the applicant needs to more clearly define what the intended use is. Currently weddings, receptions, educational programs and camps have been mentioned as possible uses. The event center would be surrounded by 12 cabins and there were questions regarding how this would be handled. Planning Commissioner Bud Elliott asked if these facilities would be available to anyone at any time.

Elias responded that the events would be tied to the homeowners and added, “We need to provide more clarification that would be comforting to Lake County.” He said there is no intention to compete with entities such as the Twin Lakes Inn.

Later Elliott moved for denial of the sketch plan, again citing concerns with the cabins.

“The cabins bother me too,” said planning Commissioner Howard Tritz. The motion, however, did not pass.

Other concerns were expressed about the water that would service the subdivision. Kelly Sweeney, president of the Friends of Twin Lakes, was enthusiastic about the proposed emergency services building, but also noted that she recognized that approval is contingent upon AngelView demonstrating it has obtained sufficient augmented water from a source with senior water rights.

Lisa Boehmke, a landowner adjacent to the proposed subdivision, wrote an email questioning how the development would affect her well, the stabilization of her water table in the future, and the surrounding wetlands. Brigitte Laing, whose family has owned a cabin in Gordon Acres since the 1970s, said that the supply from her well water should not be affected in any way by AngelView or any other development.

Dr. David Sigafoos, who said he built his Twin Lakes home with a hammer and hand saw in 1968 because there was no power, mentions that house number 2 in the site plan constitutes a major visual obstruction and aesthetic intrusion for his home and Gordon Acres.

Speaking at the public hearing, fire Chief Dan Dailey said he was in favor of the sketch plan. He said Elias had “met every criteria that was asked and then some.”

A letter was read from Chuck Fleener who recently purchased a home in Twin Lakes but has been visiting the area for 50 years. His home borders the AngelView property.

Fleener said when he initially heard about the proposed subdivision he was skeptical, but after meeting with Alan and Dawn Elias several times and checking out their statements, he said he has no reason to doubt them.

(1) comment

Kathleen Chambers

AngelView is a ecologically sensitive development that is within all codes and is honoring all requirements. Additionally, AngelView will keep 80% open space thereafter development. I am a land owner in Twin Lakes. If I honor all the codes and requirements set by Lake County, then I have the right and freedom to build a home within these requirements. Likewise, AngelView has property owners that will be developing within the codes and requirements of Lake County. My land has land that is untouched on a few sides; there may be another land owner who purchases these untouched properties and decides to build on them. In other words, when I purchased the property in hopes of being surrounded by beauty and wilderness - it may be inevitable that new landowners build next to me. I made the decision to purchase knowing that this may happen. Consequently, the landowners that live around the property of AngelView have this inevitable situation as well. I think that the neighbors who have lived here longer than AngelView should welcome their new neighbors, and treat them with respect as they are wanting to be treated.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.